Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 22:42:03 GMT -5
Many of us search on Google. We interact on Facebook. We live in digital environments overflowing with content and interactions. This effervescence generates an economy of attention in which the most scarce resource is time. A few years ago David Weinberger, who has a certain vocation as a philosopher of the digital world, published the book Everything Is Miscellaneous to analyze how we relate to and consume a huge amount of data (for example: 350,000 videos viewed on YouTube every 10 seconds). google search engine How to digest so much information on the Internet and make it useful? We do it with more information: each user encodes and classifies through their own mental models. Thus, data is understood as more unconnected data mixed or joined together for each person. A photograph is an image, but it is also a portrait, a famous person, published in a magazine, shared on social networks, in infinitely different digital contexts.
There are millions of 'unique visions' of the same object, and the order is generated for each user when searching on Google or relating that content on Facebook. Academics like Manuel Castells describe our world as the knowledge society (which others call the information society or network society), due to the crucial relevance of the content in almost all areas of life. The process is not simple, but according to the theorist Industry Email List of systems and organizational transformations Russell Ackoff, five phases can be established. When we organize data it can become information, which when understood and applied can become knowledge. Applied in a field they can become wisdom, which is the foundation for action. The risk of social exclusion is often one of the most pressing challenges, due to the importance of access to information and knowledge. It is especially described in the form of the digital divide. It is undoubtedly one of the most relevant challenges in this field, but the recent book by activist Eli Pariser delves into it from another perspective.
Pariser is closely linked to movements that try to ensure freedom on the Internet such as MoveOn.org . Excess information requires more intermediaries. No matter how much it is claimed that the Internet disintermediates, the process is not exactly like that: new intermediaries appear in certain situations, and they last as long as they add value. Thus, new filters such as Tripadvisor are being added to the traditional travel agencies in decline. The media, news publishers, compete today with content aggregators such as Google Reader, Netvibes or Yahoo News. One fact is enough: when the content farm Demand Media went public in January 2011, it reached a capitalization of more than $1.5 billion, more than the publisher The New York Times Company is worth. Around that same time, the New York Times itself launched its own recommendations platform, also based on an algorithm to help readers find news based on the type of articles that visitors have already read. Marc Frons, chief technology officer of The New York Times, explained that this is passive personalization: “we have created an algorithm that exposes users to content that they may not have seen otherwise.
There are millions of 'unique visions' of the same object, and the order is generated for each user when searching on Google or relating that content on Facebook. Academics like Manuel Castells describe our world as the knowledge society (which others call the information society or network society), due to the crucial relevance of the content in almost all areas of life. The process is not simple, but according to the theorist Industry Email List of systems and organizational transformations Russell Ackoff, five phases can be established. When we organize data it can become information, which when understood and applied can become knowledge. Applied in a field they can become wisdom, which is the foundation for action. The risk of social exclusion is often one of the most pressing challenges, due to the importance of access to information and knowledge. It is especially described in the form of the digital divide. It is undoubtedly one of the most relevant challenges in this field, but the recent book by activist Eli Pariser delves into it from another perspective.
Pariser is closely linked to movements that try to ensure freedom on the Internet such as MoveOn.org . Excess information requires more intermediaries. No matter how much it is claimed that the Internet disintermediates, the process is not exactly like that: new intermediaries appear in certain situations, and they last as long as they add value. Thus, new filters such as Tripadvisor are being added to the traditional travel agencies in decline. The media, news publishers, compete today with content aggregators such as Google Reader, Netvibes or Yahoo News. One fact is enough: when the content farm Demand Media went public in January 2011, it reached a capitalization of more than $1.5 billion, more than the publisher The New York Times Company is worth. Around that same time, the New York Times itself launched its own recommendations platform, also based on an algorithm to help readers find news based on the type of articles that visitors have already read. Marc Frons, chief technology officer of The New York Times, explained that this is passive personalization: “we have created an algorithm that exposes users to content that they may not have seen otherwise.