Post by xyz3700 on Feb 27, 2024 3:29:43 GMT -5
Judge Simone Gomes Rodrigues Casoretti, from the 9th Public Finance Court of São Paulo, determined that the São Paulo City Council sell the transport voucher at the same value as the common fare, R$ 4.30, to retail companies. reproduction Charging different values for the transport voucher "contravenes the constitutional principle of equality", said judge Since February 2019, companies that pay transportation vouchers for employees pay R$4.57 in advance per employee trip. This is because the City Hall established differentiated charging in ordinance SMT. In this Thursday's injunction (23/5), the judge considered that "the distinction between the value of the transport voucher and the common fare violates the constitutional principle of equality, since the service provided to collect the fare is the same. The action was filed by the Food Retail Trade Union of São Paulo (Sincovaga) and the decision covers all companies represented by it.
According to the lawyer representing the union, Alexandre Furtado, City Hall does not have the autonomy to increase the price through an ordinance.Both the public and private spheres had to bear numerous costs in relation to the implementation of preventive standards against the crime of money laundering, corruption and other frauds. The studies that focused on the topic were unable to reach definitive conclusions, however, some points can be mentioned: comparing the Chinese Malaysia Phone Number List direct and indirect cost of the prevention policy with the estimated volume of organized delinquency, it is clear that the victories are few. , and the costs are high [2] . On the other hand, the lack of adequate controls can also cause losses to companies, mainly in relation to fines imposed by the administrative authority, in addition to the negative impact on the company's brand and reputation, not to mention the risk of them and their managers being accused.
criminally. Therefore, despite the costs imposed on companies with the implementation of controls and standards of conduct, and the fact that criminal compliance is not capable of, in itself, avoiding criminal liability, the only way for the entrepreneur to greatly minimize the risks of a possible criminal charge is the implementation of a competent and effective governance policy, which incorporates aspects of criminal legislation.The matter was sent to the Executive Branch for presidential sanction. When actually received, the sanction period will be 20 days. Sanctioned by the President of the Republic, it will become law to be covered by the LGPD. Health data are considered “sensitive personal data” in light of article 5, II of the LGPD. Therefore, the hypotheses for processing this data without the provision of consent by the holder must comply with requirements with a higher level of rigor (article 11 of the LGPD) compared to the processing of other personal data (article 7 of the LGPD.
According to the lawyer representing the union, Alexandre Furtado, City Hall does not have the autonomy to increase the price through an ordinance.Both the public and private spheres had to bear numerous costs in relation to the implementation of preventive standards against the crime of money laundering, corruption and other frauds. The studies that focused on the topic were unable to reach definitive conclusions, however, some points can be mentioned: comparing the Chinese Malaysia Phone Number List direct and indirect cost of the prevention policy with the estimated volume of organized delinquency, it is clear that the victories are few. , and the costs are high [2] . On the other hand, the lack of adequate controls can also cause losses to companies, mainly in relation to fines imposed by the administrative authority, in addition to the negative impact on the company's brand and reputation, not to mention the risk of them and their managers being accused.
criminally. Therefore, despite the costs imposed on companies with the implementation of controls and standards of conduct, and the fact that criminal compliance is not capable of, in itself, avoiding criminal liability, the only way for the entrepreneur to greatly minimize the risks of a possible criminal charge is the implementation of a competent and effective governance policy, which incorporates aspects of criminal legislation.The matter was sent to the Executive Branch for presidential sanction. When actually received, the sanction period will be 20 days. Sanctioned by the President of the Republic, it will become law to be covered by the LGPD. Health data are considered “sensitive personal data” in light of article 5, II of the LGPD. Therefore, the hypotheses for processing this data without the provision of consent by the holder must comply with requirements with a higher level of rigor (article 11 of the LGPD) compared to the processing of other personal data (article 7 of the LGPD.